[Cos-top] binary polyhedral groups
Jeff Weeks
weeks at geometrygames.org
Fri Feb 10 14:40:59 CET 2006
Dear Cos-Top,
Jesper pointed out that the final sentence of my earlier message,
namely
This same relation holds, of course, for the other
single-action spherical manifolds.
implies something that is not correct. To make that statement
more precise (and correct!) please note that in the construction
if you travel in the direction of a symmetry axis
[of Polyhedron A] of order n, you'll find 2n translates
of the fundamental domain [Polyhedron B] spaced
pi/n radians apart
the polyhedra should be interpreted as follows:
Polyhedron A is the polyhedron for which the group is named
(that is, a tetrahedron for the binary tetrahedral group,
an octahedron for the binary octahedral group, or
an icosahedrdon for the binary icosahedral group).
Polyhedron B is the fundamental domain itself
(respectively an octahedron, a truncated cube
or a dodecahedron in the preceding three examples).
In the case of the binary icosahedral group,
the symmetries of the icosahedron are exactly
the symmetries of the dodecahedron, so no confusion
is possible.
In the case of the binary octahedral group,
the symmetries of the octahedron are exactly
the symmetries of the truncated cube, so again
no confusion is possible.
But...
in the case of the binary tetrahedral group,
the symmetries of the tetrahedron are a proper subset
of the symmetries of the fundamental domain (the octahedron).
In other words, the fundamental domain (the octahedron)
acquires some "accidental" symmetries that are not
a priori forced upon it by the symmetries of the
basic tetrahedron. In this case, to enumerate
the elements of the binary tetrahedral group, it's
crucial that we start with the basic tetrahedron,
and not with the octahedral fundamental domain.
(The reason the binary tetrahedral group's fundamental domain
acquires extra symmetry is that the tetrahedron is self-dual.
In effect the octahedral fundamental domain is the intersection
of the basic tetrahedron and its dual. Thus the doubling
of the symmetry.)
For an elementary explanation of binary polyhedral groups,
see Section 3 (pages 5161-5163) of
"Topological lensing in spherical spaces",
Classical and Quantum Gravity 18 (2001) 5155-5186
online at www.arxiv.org/gr-qc/0106033
(Someday I plan to write up a different explanation of these groups,
but for now I hope the cited reference will serve well enough.)
In any case, many thanks to Jesper for pointing out the error
in the earlier e-mail.
Best wishes to all,
Jeff
www.geometrygames.org/contact.html
More information about the Cos-top
mailing list