From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Mon May 13 23:25:53 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Mon, 13 May 2002 23:25:53 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: DE-V0.01 compilable + runnable -> antipode ? In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Cze�� wszystkim, I've written some documentation on DE, and found out how to make clickable flow charts. It's not finished, but it should be enough that you can understand more about what is in the package without having to spend much time on it right at the moment when you're busy with preparing for exams. But remember that the package is GPL protected. You'll be able to play with it later on whenever you feel like it. But the more feedback (positive and negative!) you give me and whoever has time to work on it, the better the package will be and the sooner we will be able to measure quintessence... See you on Friday at 14:00! (I might release another version by then, especially if I get some comments...) download DE-V0.02 http://www.astro.uni.torun.pl/~boud/DE_tar/ web pages on DE-V0.02 http://www.astro.uni.torun.pl/~boud/DE/ You should now be able to run DEplates to calculate a few correlation functions and plot at least one correlation function :) - if the web documentation is clear enough... Task list: > - documentation within each of the more important routines > - cosmological routines done (the ones that are called by DEplates). > - routines for reading data half-done > - main programs which do the work not done (yet) pozdrawiam boud From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Wed May 22 15:07:01 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 15:07:01 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Wed, 22 May 2002, Michal Frackowiak wrote: > OK, that should do the trick I think. > > > PS: I forgot to tell everyone that Micha� proposed adding his SNe data > > analysis routines to DE later on when he has time! Sounds like a good > > idea to me :), though it will require some work... > > ... I donot think 'some' is a proper word for matching 2 different > packages ;) ;) > but pros are: > - ready statistical tools for analysing data (based on maximum likehood) which would complement the direct null hypothesis tests which will hopefully be obvious by version DE-V0.03 in DEplotcorrnall... > - snia data analyzer module yep, nice > - cmb anisotropies data analyzis well, to be more precise, data analysis of *some* statistics of cmb anisotropy data (e.g. the C_l spectrum), I don't imagine you're analysing cmb data (maps) itself...? > these packages combined can serve as a full cosmological package... Well, maybe we could use a more modest term, e.g. "a more balanced observational cosmology research startup kit" ? > meantime I have an idea about wrting trmendously extra fast package > generating cmb power spectrum somewhat similar to DASh but much more > convinient and simpler. I estimate getting a cmb spectrum in parts of a > second based on smart-compressed grid of models (seem not to have be > dense). I am fed up with CMBFAST. > but I will have more time only after finishing my mgr... OK, in my way of thinking it would be good to think of the documentation including links to good introductory URLs on the subject, like Wayne Hu's pages, so that the whole package is more usable by beginners and that the whole learning/research process can become more open and accessible to students. > Boud: I think I got the grant! That's unofficial... Great! Pozdrawiam Boud From michalf w ncac.torun.pl Wed May 22 15:22:54 2002 From: michalf w ncac.torun.pl (Michal Frackowiak) Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 15:22:54 +0200 (CEST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > > - cmb anisotropies data analyzis > > well, to be more precise, data analysis of *some* statistics of cmb > anisotropy data (e.g. the C_l spectrum), I don't imagine you're analysing > cmb data (maps) itself...? sure - just from cl spectra, but my soft is now integrated with CMBFAST > OK, in my way of thinking it would be good to think of the documentation > including links to good introductory URLs on the subject, like Wayne > Hu's pages, so that the whole package is more usable by beginners > and that the whole learning/research process can become more open > and accessible to students. I don't think newbies use f77... but thinking about gui now is a bit to early I think regasrds - michal From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Wed May 22 16:07:14 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 16:07:14 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Wed, 22 May 2002, Michal Frackowiak wrote: > > > - cmb anisotropies data analyzis > > > > well, to be more precise, data analysis of *some* statistics of cmb > > anisotropy data (e.g. the C_l spectrum), I don't imagine you're analysing > > cmb data (maps) itself...? > > sure - just from cl spectra, but my soft is now integrated with CMBFAST OK, which AFAIK does not analyse CMB maps (but I only looked at it briefly once several years ago)... > > OK, in my way of thinking it would be good to think of the documentation > > including links to good introductory URLs on the subject, like Wayne > > Hu's pages, so that the whole package is more usable by beginners > > and that the whole learning/research process can become more open > > and accessible to students. > > I don't think newbies use f77... but thinking about gui now is a bit to > early I think For those who don't know: gui = graphical user interface If you know something about programming gui's, preferably in a GNU/Linux type environment, then I'd prefer that you can teach the rest of us sooner than later. (Of course, after your mgr is finished.) I think that gui's could accelerate learning efficiency and speed by a huge amount, and this way we could hopefully decrease the stress of exams for the students who have to do exams and let them concentrate on the fun of learning itself... It also means that *I* could finally have time to learn some of the physics that I've always wanted to learn but never had time to, thanks to using GUI's to better organise the information and the explanations... Cheers boud From michalf w ncac.torun.pl Wed May 22 18:29:34 2002 From: michalf w ncac.torun.pl (Michal Frackowiak) Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 18:29:34 +0200 (CEST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: > > I don't think newbies use f77... but thinking about gui now is a bit to > > early I think > > For those who don't know: > > gui = graphical user interface > > If you know something about programming gui's, preferably in a > GNU/Linux type environment, then I'd prefer that you can teach the > rest of us sooner than later. (Of course, after your mgr is finished.) > > I think that gui's could accelerate learning efficiency and > speed by a huge amount, and this way we could hopefully decrease > the stress of exams for the students who have to do exams and let > them concentrate on the fun of learning itself... > > It also means that *I* could finally have time to learn some of the > physics that I've always wanted to learn but never had time to, thanks > to using GUI's to better organise the information and the > explanations... > there is a nice tool called 'glade' which helps making gui in GTK+ (Gimp Toolkit) and GNOME - linking with your own functions is simple. I am not sure if there is a f77 wrapper for gtk+ ;) - there is not as I have just checked. but we can always make a front-end in c and link it to the rest of the soft - this should be simple. http://www.gtk.org http://glade.gnome.org From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Fri May 24 11:42:17 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 11:42:17 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: DE-V0.03 released (just in time ;) Message-ID: Cze�� wszystkim, Just in time for me to catch the bus to Piwnice, voil� version DE-V0.03, with more documentation (i.e. all the routines in DEreadVeron.f + the z scrambling routine, DEscramble.f) http://www.astro.uni.torun.pl/~boud/DE/ The flowcharts now show the *test* routines in green. A good test of the quality (usefulness etc) of the documentation would be to see if you can make some simple modifications of the test routines, and recompile and run them and see if the routines they test seem to work properly... See you in two hours, Boud From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Fri May 24 17:35:50 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Fri, 24 May 2002 17:35:50 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: cosmology textbooks Message-ID: Cze�� wszystkim, Printed books are expensive and slow to get, but it *is* more fun to read a book than to learn everything online. So as more people get interested in cosmology at the TCfA it would probably be good to have some more copies of the 1990s generation of basic cosmology texts; and, say, half-a-dozen copies of Numerical Recipes (unless someone knows of a better book than NumRec, since there *are* some criticisms of the subroutines which do "complicated" things like differential equations etc., but in my experience the simplest routines seem to be perfectly OK). Karolina: would you please be able to find out * the cost and approximate delay in shipping for the following: Peebles 1993 Liddle Peacock, John A. Cosmological Physics Padmanabhan Structure formation in the Universe Padmanabhan Cosmology and Astrophysics - through Problems Padmanabhan Course of Theoretical Astrophysics - Volume III: Galaxies and Cosmology (in press) Numerical Recipes * It would also be good to find out what po polsku translations of cosmology introductory texts exist and how much they cost (I guess most are from Pr�szy�ski, translated by CAMK-Warszawa people ;) Everyone: to me it makes most sense to have the library manage copies of these (though I know that I'd like to have some personal copies). I'm not sure how we should decide how many copies to get, and of which we should get copies. (Except for Numerical Recipes: I think that 3-4 copies would be reasonable.) The advantage of getting several copies of the same book is that different students would be able to work with the same language, symbol, etc. conventions and content; but the advantage of having just one or two copies of each of several *different* books is that the material is somewhat different (some of the above say nothing at all about the topology of the Universe; a few may say a little...) and so the collective knowledge of students will be better than if, e.g., just one textbook is available. I think that part of the decision should come from the experience of students - how useful do they find the books, which have the English which is easiest to understand, which do they prefer generally? But it should also come from people as they start doing *research* in cosmology - which texts are the more useful ones? There's no hurry, but these are things to think about. Pozdrawiam, Boud ______________________________________________________________________ Details with URLs: Just start from http://www.astro.uni.torun.pl/ and go to library and you'll find the catalogue search here: http://lx.bu.uni.torun.pl/cgi-bin/BG/Z2Wumk/z2w_f.pl Peebles 1993 - 1 copy po angielsku TCfA http://lx.bu.uni.torun.pl/cgi-bin/BG/Z2Wumk/z2w_f.pl?kl=4467-1022250705&pp=1&qt=F&pm=b&lok=all&pubyear=&pubrel=&liczba=5&bib=UMK&st1=ae%5Fza196960a2d0%10%09Peebles%20Phillip%20James%20Edwin&di=aPeebles%2C%20Phillip%20James%20Edwin%2E Liddle - 1 copy po angielsku TCfA 2 copies po polsku - 1 TCfA, 1 biblio g��wna UMK http://lx.bu.uni.torun.pl/cgi-bin/BG/Z2Wumk/z2w_f.pl?kl=4308-1022250625&pp=1&qt=F&pm=b&lok=all&pubyear=&pubrel=&liczba=5&bib=UMK&st1=ae%5Fza939614a2d0%10%09Liddle%20Andrew%20R&di=aLiddle%2C%20Andrew%20R%2E Peacock, John A. "Cosmological physics" - 1 copy po angielsku TCfA http://lx.bu.uni.torun.pl/cgi-bin/BG/Z2Wumk/z2w_f.pl?kl=4553-1022250731&dist=0&lok=all&liczba=5&pubyear=&pubrel=&bib=UMK&pp=1&qt=F&si=2&pm=f&st1=ae%5Fza601327a2d0%10%09Peacock%20John%20A&di=aPeacock%2C%20John%20A%2E Padmanabhan, Thanu no copy at UMK! http://www.iucaa.ernet.in/~paddy/books/books.htm Karolina, if there's difficulty getting the info, you could email Paddy at his admin address: Silk, Joseph no copy at UMK! Karolina: could you find out the title(s) of Joe's recent general books on cosmology? Chances are he's probably written a dozen in the last five years ;), and I know for sure there's at least one with a title like "Cosmology". Numerical Recipes 1 copy in TCfA http://lx.bu.uni.torun.pl/cgi-bin/BG/Z2Wumk/z2w_f.pl?kl=5345-1022251291&pp=1&qt=F&pm=b&lok=all&pubyear=&pubrel=&liczba=5&bib=UMK&st1=te%5Fzb298608%10%09Numerical%20receipes%20in%20C%20the%20art%20of%20scientific%20computing&di=tNumerical%20receipes%20in%20C%20%3A%20the%20art%20of%20scientific%20computing%20%2F 2 copies in Chemistry http://lx.bu.uni.torun.pl/cgi-bin/BG/Z2Wumk/z2w_f.pl?kl=5345-1022251291&dist=0&lok=all&liczba=5&pubyear=&pubrel=&bib=UMK&pp=1&qt=F&si=1&pm=f&st1=ttnumerical%20recipes&di=tnumerical%20recipes http://lx.bu.uni.torun.pl/cgi-bin/BG/Z2Wumk/z2w_f.pl?kl=5345-1022251291&dist=0&lok=all&liczba=5&pubyear=&pubrel=&bib=UMK&pp=2&qt=F&si=1&pm=f&st1=ttnumerical%20recipes&di=tnumerical%20recipes ______________________________________________________________________ From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Fri May 31 01:23:47 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 01:23:47 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: w_Q \approx -1.5 ??? (DE-V0.04) Message-ID: Cze�� wszystkim, I've done a bit more documentation. Now you should be able to download, compile and run DE-V0.04: http://www.astro.uni.torun.pl/~boud/DE/ and get some nice correlation function plots averaged from all six high completeness 2QZ fields, very similar to the ones in RMB2002. They're not exactly the same, because (i) the random number seeds are almost certainly different and (ii) there are probably small changes like different numerical accuracy on different computers, and small changes made to the programs since the time the results of the paper were obtained. Guess what? I couldn't wait to work on the next step, even when the documentation for the earlier steps is not finished... So I wrote DEdNdzfull (in DEscramble.f) which instead of using (scrambling) the z distribution of just the individual field being analysed, uses the full z distribution of the 2QZ-10K catalogue. It seems to me that this is a better way of producing the "true" redshift selection effects for this particular catalogue than the idea I had before of passing a "typical" QSO spectrum through the optical u, b_J and r filters. The z-scrambling technique means that some *real* signal may have been cancelled out, so the results were conservative. Now, with a more "neutral" z distribution for the "randoms", the signal should in principle be stronger - if it is real. Well, the resulting signal is spectacular! :) :) :) :) We still have a lot of work to do (I have to get plot_cf working), but it seems clear that (0.3,0.7,-1.0) gives a bad fit, and that (0.3,0.7,w_Q) with w_Q \approx -1.5 is likely to give a better fit and signal, which would greatly upset all the theorists! Anyway... during today's session you should hopefully be able to calculate these functions and see for yourself... Na popo�udnie o 14:00 godz, boud From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Fri May 31 13:23:25 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Fri, 31 May 2002 13:23:25 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: comments from Charlie Lineweaver In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Cze�� wszystkim, Gary is giving talks on RMB02 in Australia on Monday and Tuesday: On Fri, 31 May 2002, Gary Mamon wrote: > Hi Boud, > > With the better z-distribution, the 122 peak is back. With a vengeance. ;) > > Ah? Which better z-distribution? Has Brian Boyle and colleagues released > a larger sample of quasars now? If you have any new plots on this, please > send them at least by Monday morning your time, so that I can show them > for my Mt Stromlo talk (the Macquarie one will probably be less well > attended). Gary, you should be able to download, compile and run DE-V0.04 http://www.astro.uni.torun.pl/~boud/DE/ The format is somewhat similar to ArFus - there are html help files etc. Macquarie: Mon 3 Jun http://www.physics.mq.edu.au/talks/index.html (Some wrote "10QZ" instead of "2QZ-10K" ;) Stromlo: Tue 4 Jun http://msowww.anu.edu.au/astronomy/ozcalendar.shtml shape-univ course: Qn 1 I think we should discuss this afternoon whether we are ready to show some of our new results at these two talks! (It's the old question of what level of "paranoia" - about others taking our results before they are published - is reasonable.) IMHO, I think that Gary should show the new results. Qn 2 Should Gary invite people at the lectures to download DE-V0.05 (which should be ready by Monday) and have them play with it? MSZ, yes, but I'd like to know what everyone thinks... See you in 1/2 an hour, Boud From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Mon May 20 14:22:51 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 14:22:51 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: DE-V0.02 more or less OK? :) Message-ID: Cze�� wszystkim, * report on Fri 17 May lecture * credit for course * future * long term future (wrzesie�/listopad 2002) * short term future (czerwiec/lipiec/sierpie� 2002) ------------------------------------------------------------ * Fri 17 May lecture * Welcome back after 3 maja & juvenalia holidays! On Friday 17 maja the people who turned up had already downloaded DE-V0.02, and tried to compile and run. I helped with some minor comments, and everyone succeeded in getting things to the stage of running DEplates for one "field" of the 2QZ data, for one choice of Omega_m, Omega_Lambda, and plotting a real correlation function from this using plotcorrn. Of course, some more work is still needed before getting correlation functions as nice as in the final results... We discussed how to go from here, and it seems that within the constraint that people just work on the project during the Friday afternoon session, we have an efficient working style which is: - Boud adds documentation and corrects bugs during the week - on Friday, everyone else compiles/runs the new version and gives feedback on what bugs there are which seems fine to me. Of course, (see below), there are only two official lectures left... * credit for course * I think I need to tell Andrzej Strobel/Woszczyk which students have officially participated in the course, so that you get credit for it. This is the list of students based on the list membership (excluding PhD students and faculty, who don't need course credits!), please tell me if you think there is anyone missing who should get a credit: - Micha� Fr�ckowiak - Marcin Hajduk - Rafa� Kosi�ski - Hubert Krzemie� - Bartosz Lew - Pawel Ludian * future * There are only two Fridays left in the academic year (if I've understood the calendar correctly): Fri 24 May 2002 Fri 31 May 2002 * long term future (wrzesie�/listopad 2002) * I will ask Andrzeji Kus/Strobel/Woszczyk what formal possibilities there are for a course next semester, but it seems to me that what is important is: - that there is a "lecture course" where students (and faculty) can learn and get their hands on doing real cosmology research - that the "undergraduate" students (I-V roku) can get credit for the course, since it takes time away from their other coursework - that it would be best without exams, but if there is an exam, that the students are equally involved in designing the exam with the lecturer Any opinions? * short term future (czerwiec/lipiec/sierpie� 2002) * I should probably take some holidays and go to some conferences, but so far my plans are still vague. If anyone (including III roku students) thinks that he may wish to continue on the project during czerwiec/lipiec/sierpie� 2002 please say it on the list, or else at the next Friday lecture, as it is more interesting to work *with* someone than alone - maybe several people wish to work together at the same time. Probably it would be best if you put a probability. Here are my probabilities that I will be available in Toru� to work on the DE project in the next few months: czerwiec 2002 95% lipiec 2002 80% sierpie� 2002 50% If several people will be here in June (czerwiec), we could continue with the same time on Fridays, if this is convenient. Na ra�e Boud From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Mon May 20 14:36:39 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 14:36:39 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Micha�, there are comments regarding "-lX11" in the makemake file in DE-V0.02. Do you think these are sufficient, or should we put them somewhere else? My idea is that the user should edit the makemake file, and not the makefile itself, for things like PGPLOT environment variables, libraries like X11, etc. Boud From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Mon May 20 17:34:54 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 17:34:54 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: -lX11 (fwd) Message-ID: My first copy of this seems to have gone missing. Is the sympa daemon down? Or is putting a "-" at the beginning of the Subject: header a problem? > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > Date: Mon, 20 May 2002 14:36:39 +0200 (MET DST) > From: Boud Roukema To: shape-univ w ... > Subject: -lX11 > > Micha�, there are comments regarding "-lX11" in the makemake file > in DE-V0.02. > > Do you think these are sufficient, or should we put them somewhere > else? My idea is that the user should edit the makemake file, > and not the makefile itself, for things like PGPLOT environment > variables, libraries like X11, etc. > > Boud From michalf w ncac.torun.pl Tue May 21 16:38:59 2002 From: michalf w ncac.torun.pl (Michal Frackowiak) Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 16:38:59 +0200 (CEST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: On Mon, 20 May 2002, Boud Roukema wrote: > Micha�, there are comments regarding "-lX11" in the makemake file > in DE-V0.02. > > Do you think these are sufficient, or should we put them somewhere > else? My idea is that the user should edit the makemake file, > and not the makefile itself, for things like PGPLOT environment > variables, libraries like X11, etc. > > Boud > I think the best way would be to create a GNU hierarchy - e.g. Makefile.in and configure... This could autodetect the hardware and create a proper Makefile. But for now I think makemake should be enough. But perhaps you should add a line like that: # uncomment the following line for inclusion of PGPLOT and X11 libraries # LIBS='-lpgplot -lX11 -L"/usr/X11R6/lib"' Works fine for me (tested on linux). In some free time I can dig some automake docs and see if it is worth converting to gnu configuration. Michal From michalf w ncac.torun.pl Tue May 21 16:43:55 2002 From: michalf w ncac.torun.pl (Michal Frackowiak) Date: Tue, 21 May 2002 16:43:55 +0200 (CEST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Too fast have I said it works... Boud: the libraries line looks fine in makefile as: LIBS=-lpgplot -lX11 -L"/usr/X11R6/lib" BUT: variable LIBS is not used anymore in the makefile except this moment. It should be present in all the places where ARGOPTIONS is used (or we shall add LIBS to ARGOPTIONS). Michal From amr w astro.uni.torun.pl Wed May 22 08:49:22 2002 From: amr w astro.uni.torun.pl (Andrzej Marecki) Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 08:49:22 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: from Michal Frackowiak at "May 21, 2002 04:43:55 pm" Message-ID: <200205220649.IAA27146@galileo.astro.uni.torun.pl> > Boud: the libraries line looks fine in makefile as: > > LIBS=-lpgplot -lX11 -L"/usr/X11R6/lib" > FYI, on SUN-s in astro.uni.torun.pl domain every user gets PGPLOT env. variable set to: PGPLOT=-L/opt/lib -lpgplot -L/usr/openwin/lib -lX11 So the compilation of PGPLOT related stuff may look as this: f77 -o this_is_my_binary pgplot_related.f $PGPLOT A. From boud w astro.uni.torun.pl Wed May 22 09:44:01 2002 From: boud w astro.uni.torun.pl (Boud Roukema) Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 09:44:01 +0200 (MET DST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: Cze�� Micha�, Andrzej, On Tue, 21 May 2002, Michal Frackowiak wrote: > Too fast have I said it works... > Boud: the libraries line looks fine in makefile as: > > LIBS=-lpgplot -lX11 -L"/usr/X11R6/lib" I think this is based on what *you* have put into makemake. I've added a few lines to makemake: # HOW TO MODIFY: # Modify the file makemake and run it to recreate makefile. # which will get written near the beginning of makefile. > > BUT: variable LIBS is not used anymore in the makefile except this This is why my own (created) makefile has LIBS= i.e. nothing. > moment. It should be present in all the places where ARGOPTIONS is used > (or we shall add LIBS to ARGOPTIONS). I think ARGOPTIONS is unused - it's left over from when I copied the file from the pgplot makemake file... OK, I've added some clearer suggestions of values of PGPLOT and LIBS that could be uncommented in the file makemake. Here's the new full section on PGPLOT from the makemake file: ############################################################## ## pgplot ## # If you do NOT have PGPLOT, then the following two lines must # be UNcommented, and the alternative option below commented (with #). # 2 lines to UNcomment if you do NOT have PGPLOT: # PGOPTIONS="$OBIN/pgnull.o" # PGDEPEND="$OBIN/pgnull.o" # If you DO have PGPLOT, then the two lines below must # be UNcommented, and the alternative option above commented (with #). # # You will also need to have LIBS and PGPLOT defined # as environment variables, e.g., setenv LIBS "-lpgplot -lX11" # and setenv PGPLOT -L$PGPLOT_DIR should be in your .cshrc . # Alternatively, you could define them as shell variables # here, # e.g. # ( # PGPLOT='-L$PGPLOT_DIR' # or # PGPLOT='-L/opt/lib -L/usr/openwin/lib' # or # PGPLOT='-L/usr/X11R6/lib' # ) and # LIBS='-lpgplot -lX11' # (Warning: do NOT use spaces around the '=' sign). # 2 lines to UNcomment if you DO have PGPLOT: PGOPTIONS="$PGPLOT $LIBS" PGDEPEND=" " #echo "PGOPTIONS= $PGOPTIONS" ### Lines below unlikely to need modification. ### ############################################################## http://www.astro.uni.torun.pl/sympa/shape-univ/2002-05/msg00004.html > In some free time I can dig some automake docs and see if it is worth > converting to gnu configuration. A GNU style of automake probably would be better than the PGPLOT style, as long as it works for fortran. (And after all, I ended up creating DEconfig.f which is probably not the most standard way of implementing system dependent options...) Pozdrawiam Boud PS: I forgot to tell everyone that Micha� proposed adding his SNe data analysis routines to DE later on when he has time! Sounds like a good idea to me :), though it will require some work... From michalf w ncac.torun.pl Wed May 22 14:24:41 2002 From: michalf w ncac.torun.pl (Michal Frackowiak) Date: Wed, 22 May 2002 14:24:41 +0200 (CEST) Subject: -lX11 In-Reply-To: Message-ID: OK, that should do the trick I think. > PS: I forgot to tell everyone that Michał proposed adding his SNe data > analysis routines to DE later on when he has time! Sounds like a good > idea to me :), though it will require some work... ... I donot think 'some' is a proper word for matching 2 different packages ;) but pros are: - ready statistical tools for analysing data (based on maximum likehood) - snia data analyzer module - cmb anisotropies data analyzis these packages combined can serve as a full cosmological package... meantime I have an idea about wrting trmendously extra fast package generating cmb power spectrum somewhat similar to DASh but much more convinient and simpler. I estimate getting a cmb spectrum in parts of a second based on smart-compressed grid of models (seem not to have be dense). I am fed up with CMBFAST. but I will have more time only after finishing my mgr... Boud: I think I got the grant! That's unofficial... regards michal