[Cosmo-media] PROPOSAL for a reply
Bartosz Lew
Bartosz.Lew at astri.uni.torun.pl
Tue Feb 21 06:57:43 CET 2006
hi all.
On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Boud Roukema wrote:
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Andrzej Marecki wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:53:25PM +0100, Boud Roukema wrote:
>>
>>> The proposed text is between ######### - i'm not sure if Bartek or Andrzej
>>> want to sign, or even if this is compatible with Andrzej's arguments,
>>
>> It's a clever "workaround". :) Go ahead!
>
It sure is. It sure is. :) It's like saying "go and find out yourself, the
info is all around you, and to make it easier I drop you some links which
are more less consistent with what I would have answered if you came to
me for an interview (followed by a small bank money transfer ;p)." :)
I like this solution, since as I said before, more soriously
this would sound if someone came to Boud personally (or phoned him)
to ask for his oppinion on sciantific problems. This didn't happen, so to
me it is just seeking for some answers, rather then collecting experts
opinions on topology. The latter would naturally be followed by a
quotations in a newspaper like ".....- says BR. from CAUMK", while the
earlier results just in a pedagogical explanations in the related field.
So the official answer is fine with me. Also I think there is no need for
me to sign. I responded to cosmo-media and cosmo-torun to join the discussion, but
the question was sent directly to Boud - he made it public - but
natural way is that any reply goes from Boud.
BTW. Neither I see no need to sign by Boud, according to what I've just wrote
few lines above. That's my point of view.
pozdr,
Bartek
More information about the Cosmo-media
mailing list