[Cosmo-media] PROPOSAL for a reply

[Boud Roukema]

ok

good

pozdr
boud


On Tue, 21 Feb 2006, Bartosz Lew wrote:

> hi all.
>
> On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Boud Roukema wrote:
>
> >
> > On Mon, 20 Feb 2006, Andrzej Marecki wrote:
> >
> >> On Mon, Feb 20, 2006 at 02:53:25PM +0100, Boud Roukema wrote:
> >>
> >>> The proposed text is between ######### - i'm not sure if Bartek or Andrzej
> >>> want to sign, or even if this is compatible with Andrzej's arguments,
> >>
> >> It's a clever "workaround". :) Go ahead!
> >
>
> It sure is. It sure is. :) It's like saying "go and find out yourself, the
> info is all around you, and to make it easier I drop you some links which
> are more less consistent with what I would have answered if you came to
> me for an interview (followed by a small bank money transfer ;p)." :)
>
> I like this solution, since as I said before, more soriously
> this would sound if someone came to Boud personally (or phoned him)
> to ask for his oppinion on sciantific problems. This didn't happen, so to
> me it is just seeking for some answers, rather then collecting experts
> opinions on topology. The latter would naturally be followed by a
> quotations in a newspaper like ".....- says BR. from CAUMK", while the
> earlier results just in a pedagogical explanations in the related field.
> So the official answer is fine with me. Also I think there is no need for
> me to sign. I responded to cosmo-media and cosmo-torun to join the discussion, but
> the question was sent directly to Boud - he made it public - but
> natural way is that any reply goes from Boud.
> BTW. Neither I see no need to sign by Boud, according to what I've just wrote
> few lines above. That's my point of view.
>
> pozdr,
> Bartek
>
> _______________________________________________
> Cosmo-media mailing list
> Cosmo-media at cosmo.torun.pl
> http://cosmo.torun.pl/mailman/listinfo/cosmo-media
>