Cze�� wszystkim, I am very glad that several of you (at least three people) have had the courage to tell me that I have to do some work (in documenting the software), otherwise we will not get anywhere in our "monograph course"! This a good sign for learning how to work together :).

So, I'm about to start preparing some documentation. My plan is to follow the PGPLOT style documentation which was used for the ArFus galaxy formation package:

http://darc3.obspm.fr/~roukema/ArFus/index.html

(You can download a *local* copy of the full package, including small example N-body simulations here - total size 31Mb: http://www.astro.uni.torun.pl/~boud/ArFus_tar/ArFus-V0.03.tar.gz )

Question: what name do we want to call our package? I think the name should not be too long, and it would be good to have a two-letter abbreviation to put in the subroutine (module) names, like "PG" for pgplot, "AF" for ArFus.

Some ideas with comments + for - against ...

ShapeUniv - SU + easy to say - confusion with SU groups of superstring theory? - confusion with Soviet Union?

DarkEnergy - DE + easy to say - confusion with the name of a neighbouring country?

FormaWszech�wiata - FW - confusion with "forward" in emails - difficult to say "FW..." for the name of a subroutine - includes a non-latin-1 character

ObservCosm - OC - pretentious (claims to cover all of observational cosmology)

TorunCosm - TC + maybe the best? - confusion with TCP/IP?

QuintEssence - QE - confusion with Queen Elizabeth?

CosmParameters - CP --- confusion with Communist Party

KoperNik - KN - too many things are called Copernicus in Toru� & Poland - pretentious?

Well, I've spent enough time on this, I'm sure others have some ideas. I'll put "DE" for the moment - we can change this later with a shell script depending on what people choose.

Na ra� Boud